The Next RealEstate Boom
In the coming 25 years, the biggest wave ofdevelopment since
World War II will turn America's major metro areas into giant
"megapolitans" teeming with opportunity. Want to get in? We've
foundsome strategies that are already paying dividends.
By Paul Kaihla
November 1, 2005
(Business 2.0) - Nearly 20 years ago, Mike Ingram, almost broke,took
the gamble of a lifetime. He packed his wife and six children
into anOldsmobile and U-Haul and drove 1,000 miles to Phoenix,
leaving his life in OklahomaCity in the dust. The company that
Ingram had run, a distributor of veterinarydrugs and garden
supplies, provided a decent living, but after Ingram's bank
went belly-up, like many others at the time, Ingram decided
to sell thebusiness. Then 42, Ingram was prepared to take a
flier on a tantalizing Plan B:buying plots of desert land in
places like Arizona that were on the verge of abuilding boom.
"Phoenix was set to go," Ingram says, "and so was I."
Today, Phoenix is still going. And Ingram, the dust-bowl migrant, isstill
cementing his reputation as one of the Sun Belt's most prescientspeculators.
The investments he scraped together in the mid-1980s for tracts of
farmland--including a ranch once owned by John Wayne--helped ignite asuburban
building boom that hasn't let up. More than 500,000 homes have beenerected in
Phoenix since 1990. Ingram's real estate investment firm, El DoradoHoldings,
ranks as one of the biggest private landowners in Arizona, with holdingsworth
nearly $1 billion.
But the real payoff, Ingram says, liesahead. Among
other deals in the works, Ingram is spearheading a development calledDouglas
Ranch--covering 34,000 acres, more than twice the size ofManhattan--near the
small town of Buckeye, 45 minutes west of Phoenix. Plans for more than adozen
adjacent communities are already in the making. At the moment, Buckeyeis
essentially a dusty crossroads on Interstate 10, home to 15,000 farmersand
longtime residents. But within two decades, brokers say, it will betransformed
into a giant suburban metropolis nearly as large as Phoenix itself.
Ingram's latest deal hints at a bigger story starting tounfold
nationwide. As Buckeye and other exurbs emerge, eventually they'll boltonto one
another until Phoenix and Tucson, its sister city 120 miles southeast,join
somewhere in the middle. According to new studies by Robert Lang, anurban
planning professor at Virginia Tech, and researchers at the Brookings
Institution, similar growth scenarios will play out in nine other majormetro
areas around the country, forming what Lang calls the new "megapolitan"regions
of the United States. (For a detailed look at these megapolitans andtheir
growth prospects, see "The $25 Trillion Land Grab," page 97.)
As America makes room for 70 million more people duringthe next two
decades, these supercities represent the biggest long-term business
opportunities since the end of World War II. In Oregon and Washington,growth
trends see Portland and Seattle merging by 2030 into a single megaregionLang
has dubbed Cascadia. In the South, Atlanta and Raleigh-Durham stand atopposite
ends of a 400-mile stretch of Interstate 85, but emerging hubs in
transportation, banking, and biotech will knit them together. "There's aspectacular phenomenon here that people have ignored," says ArmandoCarbonell,
co-chairman of planning and development at the Lincoln Institute of LandPolicy
in Cambridge, Mass. "Everybody is so focused on whether the real estatemarket
is headed up or down, they can't see what's down the road."
Figuring out what investment angles to play--in whichregions, from
so many statistical trajectories, covering such a long timeperiod--would give
most entrepreneurs a migraine. But for others, the paths to becoming a
megapolitan mogul are clearer than you might think. Brokers, planners,and
developers agree on three emerging strategies: In the South and theWest, owning
a piece of tomorrow's boomtowns is already driving billions in long-termspeculation; Ingram is just one master of the game. In the morecongested East,
developers are buying parking lots and other underutilized land with aneye
toward launching massive "infill" projects--looking for the cheapestdowntown
and suburban property to deliver the biggest returns. And in almostevery
region, a third trend is reeling in big money: Surging numbers of youngLatino
families and immigrants are opening doors of opportunity for businessesjostling
to figure out what they'll need and want.
There are more cautious ways to get a piece of the action,of
course, such as buying stock in companies like Target and Wal-Mart,which will
always go where the growth is. "But if you're a more hands-on type,"says Bruce
Katz, the top urban planning researcher at the Brookings Institution,"there's
land speculation and a whole new generation of opportunities." Here arejust a
few--and some of the players placing the biggest bets.
STRATEGY 1
Step Into the Path of Sprawl
Lang's 10 megapolitans are already home to more thantwo-thirds of
Americans, and according to census projections, their aggregatepopulation will
grow by more than 25 percent during the next 25 years. By 2040 theregions will
account for 75 percent of all money spent in the United States onprivate real
estate (about $10 trillion) and create 64 million new jobs.
Every megapolitan has its own Buckeyes--raw land destinedfor
bulldozers and homebuilders--but few possess the kind of economicperfect storm
for growth and profit that Arizona boasts. No other region offers suchgreat
volumes of buildable land at such low prices. An acre of dirt can stillbe had
for as little as $25,000, compared with $1 million on the outer fringesof
Chicago. Land tagged for development will drive a near doubling of the
Phoenix/Tucson region's population, and unlike Los Angeles, the area hasenough
water--from underground rivers, aqueducts, and nearby mountains--tosupport all
the new residents.
No wonder speculators have been circling the Arizonadesert like
condors. One California-based developer of big-box malls recently paid$15
million for a 77-acre quadrant of empty desert at a new freeway exitoutside
Buckeye. A plot for a future exit down the road that sold for $2 asquare foot
last year is flipped today for $4. "The country is swarming Phoenix,"says Nate
Nathan, the top commercial real estate broker in the area. "This placeis on
fire."
The fire has been hottest for folks like Ingram who got inearly and
bet big. Before taking on the Douglas Ranch project in Buckeye, Ingramand his
longtime partner, Monty Ortman, had acquired some 18,000 acres. Most ofthat
land, Ingram says, he got for just $500 per acre. Along the way, he soldoff
half of the holdings at huge profits to fund new acquisitions andsubdivisions.
Here's a typical deal: In 1992, Ingram and Ortman acquired John Wayne's
6,500-acre former ranch in Maricopa, another nascent "boomburb" 40 milessouth
of Phoenix, for about $3 million. Earlier this year El Dorado Holdingssold
two-thirds of it to Engle Homes, a national homebuilder, for $160million plus a
future royalty on each of the 15,000 houses Engle will build there. Aneven
bigger payday awaits Ingram in Buckeye. Douglas Ranch will eventuallyhave
84,000 homes, 250,000 residents, four freeway interchanges, and dozensof office
parks and malls. "Buckeye's fate is sealed," Lang says. "It will be abig city."
Each region has a few "edge" cities like Buckeye, wheretrends are
converging to trigger a flash flood of construction. Buying land earlythere can
generate head-spinning windfalls for players like Ingram, but there areplenty
of lucrative wrinkles for others. In-N-Out Burger, for instance, emergedfrom
1960s suburban sprawl outside Los Angeles. HEB Grocery Stores became an$11
billion company by establishing footholds in bedroom communities aroundSan
Antonio.
Tomorrow's boomtowns hold the same promise. In Maricopa, aSubway
franchise and a Carl's Jr. were among the main eateries in town at thestart of
the year. Pat Kieny, who had spent 20 years managing other people'srestaurants
in the region, took that as a cue: Start a restaurant in Maricopa thatcould
become a regional favorite before a stampede of national brands overrunsthe
town. With help from friends, Kieny, 45, put down 20 percent of the$850,000
initial investment and last July opened Native New Yorker, aChili's-like sports
bar. Kieny says he'll be able to repay his investors in three years, bywhich
time he hopes to open two new locations. "McDonald's, Taco Bell, andother food
chains are coming next year," Kieny says. "But I've already got a localbrand
and a loyal clientele. The mayor and fire chief eat lunch here."
Sounds almost too easy. The truth is, it's easy to make alot of
foolish bets in sprawl development where the conditions aren't asfriendly as
they are in Arizona. In more congested suburban metro areas--like thenorthern
Virginia towns enveloping Washington, or the exurbs of Chicago--risingfuel
costs and long commutes are killing the appetite for more bulldozing ofraw
land. Many people who bought a McMansion an hour away from the officewhen gas
cost less than $2 a gallon are already downsizing. Zoning nightmares indenser
regions are also sending developers elsewhere. "In Dallas, I can get a
development approved in nine months," says Greg Vogel, a top commercialland
broker based in Scottsdale, Ariz. "Around San Francisco or Los Angeles,it can
take a decade--lawsuits included."
STRATEGY 2
Park Money in Parking Lots
If the major metro areas around the country were to growthe way
they did after World War II, they would gobble up more than 100 millionacres of
raw land and convert it to urban space by 2030. But you won't find thatkind of
available land in dense Eastern cities like Boston and New York. That'sone
reason roughly half of all new development between now and 2030 willsimply
replace existing structures. "Every beltway around every big metro, andall of
the big arterial highways and interstate links, have been used up," saysBob
Yaro, a planning expert in New York City who chairs an advisory groupfor the
reconstruction of the World Trade Center. "There's no capacity. We'regoing to
have to be really creative."
And smart. Investing in new skyscrapers doesn't work in acity
surrounded by a horizon of cheaper land. That's why Arizona developersare
rolling their eyes at Donald Trump and other out-of-towners who haveproposed
high-rise condo towers in nearby Scottsdale. They won't sell, theyargue,
because a buyer can get a house with a two-car garage and pool for thesame
price in the suburbs. "You have to go with the flow," says RobertMayhew, an
executive at DMB, the developer behind a new community in Buckeye calledVerrado. (See "Unarrested Development," page 104.) "Why would you doinfill in a
market like this?"
So where does infill work? On the cheapest land in themost crowded
places: parking lots. They're adjacent to commercial and retailstructures, they
cost little to demolish, and there are plenty of them. According to theUrban
Land Institute, the United States has about 30 percent more parkingspaces than
it needs, one reason many developers believe they'll deliver the biggestreturns.
Parking lots helped persuade Charles Wang, the 61-year-oldfounder
of Computer Associates, now the world's third-largest software company,to
become a real estate mogul. After stepping down four years ago as CA'schairman,
Wang, a co-owner of the New York Islanders hockey franchise, launched a
development firm and began dreaming of a massive complex around theNassau
Coliseum, where the Islanders play.
Wang bought a long-term lease for the 77-acre site in LongIsland's
Uniondale, nearly all of it covered by parking spaces that sat empty 95percent
of the time. "It's an asphalt desert," Wang says of his acquisition. Hisplan
will replace the pavement with a multilevel parking deck for thousandsof cars,
leaving room for condos, a conference center, and a 60-story skyscraper.Estimated price tag: $1 billion.
Yaro calls the project a crucible of the future. "It's aperfect
example of how we're going to have to exploit land previously wasted by50 years
of sprawl," he says. "There's no other way to accommodate growth in theEast."
STRATEGY 3
Give Them What They Quieren
Capitalizing on the development boom doesn't mean riskingeverything
on a land grab. You can find opportunities just as big by startingbusinesses
that cater to an underserved Latino population that is growing like noother
group in American history. The U.S. Latino population will swell from 40million
to 73 million between now and 2030. It is the fastest-growing ethnicgroup in
all but three of the 10 megapolitans.
Numbers like those helped persuade Toyota to build a new$850
million plant in San Antonio to produce Tundra pickups. "We think theHispanic
market and I-35 present a long-range opportunity," says Toyota seniorvice
president Dennis Cuneo. Texas is the largest truck market in the UnitedStates,
with Latinos making up the fastest-growing group of buyers. Toyota wantsto
unseat Ford's F-150 in the Texas market but currently ranks third insales,
behind Ford and Chevrolet.
The solution? Build brand loyalty by helping to crown anew
generation of Latino industrialists. Toyota has begun signing contractsto
purchase Tundra parts from new suppliers in the area that aremajority-owned by
Latinos. One such entrepreneur is former SBC executive Berto Guerra, 55,who
retired last year to create Avanzar Interior Technologies, a supplier ofseats
and other parts. Guerra and his partners own 51 percent of the firm,which is
part of a joint venture with $28 billion Johnson Controls. Next yearGuerra will
have 400 workers, and he estimates first-year sales at $100 million.
Just as Toyota "made" Guerra, Guerra will soon makeothers. He plans
to recruit other Latinos to become some of his many subcontractors."I'll walk
into the bank when they apply for a loan and say, 'I want this businessto
supply me with this gizmo for the next 10 years,'" Guerra says. "Thinkof the
ripple effect."
Another player profiting from Latino growth is CityView, adevelopment firm founded five years ago by Henry Cisneros, a former U.S.secretary of housing, with $7 billion homebuilder KB Homes. The companyhas
invested $1 billion in inner-city homes aimed at Latino markets in Texasand
California and will soon move into Atlanta, Chicago, and Tampa. CityViewmakes
money by acting as a venture capitalist. It funds builders when it spotsthe
right project, and then tunes the design to buyers' tastes. Whenarchitects saw
that Dallas residents converted carports into bedrooms, CityView decidedto
embed plumbing in the carports for future sinks and toilets. CityViewestimates
2006 revenues of $1 billion on 20 percent returns--considered a home runin
urban redevelopment.
Where Latinos will shop will also look different from themalls of
classic suburbia. Hispanic Retail Group, a division of $1 billion ForestCity
Enterprises, recently bought an empty Kmart and Vons in Coachella,Calif., a
desert town east of Palm Springs. The stores didn't appeal toresidents--90
percent are Latino--so HRG plans to subdivide the Kmart into a villagemarket
inspired by Plaza Mexico, a Latino retail mecca in the southeastern L.A.suburb
of Lynwood. HRG president Andres Friedman pitched a similar project lastyear to
a city official in nearby Indio but got a cold reception. "She saidconsumers
there want upscale stores like Williams-Sonoma," Friedman says. "Indiois 75
percent Hispanic. They're not into Williams-Sonoma."
The future residents of Buckeye certainly will be, if theluxury
homes Mike Ingram and others are building sell as planned. At themoment,
there's little reason to think they won't. But if his real estateambitions go
sour, or if projections about megapolitan growth are off the mark,Ingram has an
ace up his sleeve. Having watched his own overleveraged bank and 60others
collapse along with oil prices in the early 1980s, he and Ortman decidedlong
ago to always pay cash for land. Should the boom go bust, they won't oweanyone
a dime. "It's been a wonderful run, and it's a wonderful market," Ingramsays,
"but you don't count your money when you're still at the table."
|